Kage Design logo kage
articos.com
Articos MCP feature grid component

Design analysis

A two-column problem section pairs a strong left-aligned argument with a restrained comparison graphic on the right, making the cost of the status quo tangible.

Prompt preview
## Reference images

Study these alongside the description below: hierarchy, rhythm, spacing, colour. Build for the product you are asked about, using this design language.

- Component: https://kage-design-assets.t3.tigrisfiles.io/components/articos-mcp/b74b5a52-121a-40b3-9410-436e13736de5-1791957711-3.webp
- Full page it was cut from: https://kage-design-assets.t3.tigrisfiles.io/screenshots/articos-mcp/b74b5a52-121a-40b3-9410-436e13736de5-1791957659853-full.webp
- Component on Kage: https://kage.design/component/articos-mcp-feature-grid

## Before you start
Ask what costly problem the user's product solves, what evidence supports it, and what visual comparison would make the problem immediately understandable.

Create a two-column problem section on a near-black background (`#0d0d0b`) with a warm editorial feel.

- Use a narrow uppercase eyebrow in muted gold (`#9e8840`), then a 32–44px ivory heading with a deliberate line break.
- Place 2–3 short paragraphs beneath in 13–15px text, around `#aaa69b`, with a maximum reading width of 360px.
- On the right, show a simple dark comparison or timeline graphic: subdued charcoal bars, one highlighted gold path, tiny labels, and a clear contrast between the old process and the improved one.
- Align the graphic vertically with the heading block and avoid decorative card chrome unless it helps explain the data.
- Use generous 96–140px section padding and a faint horizontal divider at the boundary.
- Collapse to one column on mobile, placing the explanatory text before the visual.

Never use logos, product names, copy, illustrations, or imagery from the reference.

More components